Category: Retention Management

ARA 2023 – appreciating the value of archives

Posted by on in Information Management, Records Management, Retention Management

Thought-provoking presentations provide fresh ideas and new insights.

We were thrilled to attend the recent Archive and Records Association (ARA) Annual Conference in Belfast earlier this month.

This was our first time attending this event and it was a fantastic opportunity to meet and learn from so many like-minded peers.

Our very own Records Management Expert, Company Director and Information Management Consultant here at Metataxis, Noeleen Schenk was there, in both the roles of delegate and speaker. She shares her experience and notable highlights below:

The Archive and Records Association (ARA) Annual Conference was a really enjoyable event. I got to attend many thought-provoking presentations and have come away professionally revived – buzzing with fresh thoughts and new insights to bring to our own client work.

As an information manager, focused on current information and records, I am in awe of the work our archival colleagues undertake. I heard some remarkable stories how lost or nearly lost archives were rescued, how to catalogue archives to facilitate access, and how we can interpret archival content to further enhance our understanding of the past – these sessions were truly fascinating.

Key takeaways from the Archive and Records Association (ARA) Conference

  1. It is shocking to learn how many organisations and institutions do not value archives or consider their community memory
  2. Archivists are exceedingly proactive in engaging with their communities
  3. I will visit and view exhibitions in a whole new light and with much more appreciation
  4. We, as a profession, need to engage with archival colleagues so much more
  5. Archivists should be involved from the start of the record creation, and not just at the end of the life cycle
  6. Archivists are actively engaged with the management, preservation and interpretation of their records, while as information managers, we typically operate at a more arms length, providing guidance and policy at a macro rather than micro level.

It was great to be amongst such friendly delegates, hearing everyone talking with real joy and enthusiasm and to be part of such a shared passion for records management.

We look forward to seeing you there next year!

Learn more about how we support organisations with records management. 

ARA Conference 2023

A fundamental approach to making data retention work

Posted by on in Retention Management, Retention Schedules

Metataxis shares key recommendations for data retention at ARA 2023.

The Archive and Records Association (ARA) Annual Conference took place from 30 August – 01 September 2023 in Belfast – did you get to go?

This annual three-day event welcomes people from the global records management and archiving community who get together to network with peers, attend a range of practical workshops and hear from high profile speakers and influential players of the record keeping sector.

Our very own Records Management Expert, Company Director and Information Management Consultant here at Metataxis, Noeleen Schenk, took to the stage to deliver a focussed presentation featuring practical strategies to successfully design and apply retention and disposition rules for business records, as well as sharing a compelling case study and lessons learnt from a recent records management project for a major multinational company.

Don’t worry if you missed her, simply get in touch and we can share her records management recommendations and data retention strategies with you too!

How to implement retention schedules

Posted by on in Records Management, Retention Management, Retention Schedules

Where the rubber hits the road: Implementation

In her latest blog series, Siobhan King, Senior Consultant at Metataxis, addresses the value of big bucket data retention and how to ensure complex records management requirements are accommodated.

Here’s part 6 – the final blog in the series, where she looks at how to successfully implement your retention schedules into the organisation.

Retention implementation plan

During this series, we’ve been looking at ways to simplify the retention schedule into bigger buckets. A retention schedule will usually take the form of a table which can then be applied to systems and communicated to staff. The retention schedule may be supported by a written document, usually a retention policy or records policy, and this will outline the governance, scope, roles, responsibilities, compliance expectations, etc. The last piece of the puzzle is the implementation plan, which is the practical application of the retention schedule to the records held in your systems.

Document the practicalities

It’s inevitable when talking to stakeholders that they will flag up concerns about the implementation of records retention policies very early on. In fact, they are likely to identify practical issues as reasons why longer retention periods should be applied to certain records. In an ideal world, these practical limitations should never dictate the retention period for a records class. Instead, steps should be taken to improve the metadata, or to improve processes, so that new records can be managed appropriately, and legacy records dealt with more strategically.

Adopt a risk-based approach

Because we work in complex environments, it is necessary to have some kind of strategy to apply retention to both newly created records going forward as well as older records created in the past. This means having a good information architecture that supports retention management and a risk-based approach to the legacy records.

big bucket data

Leverage simple systems rules

This is just one element of planning for retention schedules implementation. There are numerous practical considerations that can be taken in order to get through the bulk of retention management. And yes, you guessed it, opportunities to lump things together in the implementation plan. For example, your retention schedule may have the following two rules:

  1. Financial management – 7 years from end of financial year then delete
  2. Annual strategic planning – 7 years from end of financial year then delete

These two classes stem from different functions but require the same retention treatment. This means that a retention rule may be created in systems that states: “delete content 7 years from end of financial year”. It will do the job for both classes and if disposal is done in line with the retention schedule (meaning metadata also is collected) it doesn’t matter what the technical mechanism. This is also helpful for more manual applications of retention where searches for eligible records are done for anything older than 7 years in relevant system areas for both functions.

Capture stakeholder intelligence

Finally, remember those tricky discussions with stakeholders where they provided masses of detail? An implementation plan is the perfect place to capture all that valuable intelligence. Not the retention schedule. Retention schedules need to be super simple.

Avoid complex rules for your retention schedules

While there’s some scope to have lots of detail in a description field to help users identify the right retention period for their records, there’s not much room for nuance in your actual schedule.

The more “ifs”, “ors” and “except fors” you have in the schedule, the more complex your retention rules will be. Complexity costs. And your users will get confused by a schedule with too many caveats. Save these for the implementation plan – it will be valuable intelligence for dealing with those legacy issues! And the plan is the thing that will make your retention schedule real!

So that’s the final entry of the series. I hope you have found it useful. If you want to know more about what implementation plans should look like or would like to learn more about practical data retention and records management, simply contact us.

How to deal with “just in case” retention requirements

Posted by on in Information Management, Records Management, Retention Management, Retention Schedules

Herding cats: Dealing with “just in case”

Trying to keep your retention schedules simple is an ongoing battle against the forces of complexity. And one of the major things that will hinder your plans to simplify your retention requirements will be your retention schedule stakeholders. People really do like to hold on to things. Sometimes legitimately, sometimes not so much.

In her latest blog, Siobhan King, Senior Consultant at Metataxis, reveals ways to ensure complex records management and retention requirements are accommodated.

Here’s part 5:

Herding skills

Growing up in New Zealand, a television favourite of mine was a local version of A Man and his Dog, which was named with typical kiwi literal-mindedness: The Dog Show.

When designing data retention schedules, I often think back to the steeliness of two dogs named Zip and Jess as they stared down particularly toey sheep to nudge them into their pens. Just like the pens on A Man and his Dog, you must gently, but firmly, guide your users towards the right retention management decisions.

The dreaded “just in case” argument

“Just in case” is the kind of phrase most records managers dread hearing from their stakeholders.

There are many perfectly legitimate reasons users give for wanting to hold on to records for a certain period of time. There may be a law or regulation that needs to be adhered to, rights that are protected, or business processes which require the records to be referred to at any point in time.

But then there are the more nebulous reasons people give for holding on to records – “just in case something happens, and I need them.” Just in case what? Well, it could be just about anything.

And herein lies the problem. With enough imagination, you can dream up any worst-case scenario where an obscure old record saves the day.

just in case retention requirements

Isolated incidents

And what is even worse… is when there actually has been a freak occurrence where this exact situation has happened. Someone has managed to save your organisation a great deal of money or embarrassment with an email they’ve had stored in their mailbox for nine years.

Take a deep breath, hold your nerve and have some of these questions ready when talking to someone who presents you with a “just in case” argument:

  1. Check they understand triggers: Check that your stakeholders understand that information will not be disposed of before they are triggered. “Just in case” may arise from a misunderstanding of triggers and a fear that you’re going to delete records out from under people while they still have a legitimate need for them.
  1. Consider the personal data and data subject rights: Look at the personal data that is held in each record and whether you can reasonably argue that there is a legitimate business need that outweighs data subject rights? Remind people that your organisation does have to meet data protection requirements which does not accept “just in case” as a reason for retention.
  1. Measure the risk: Ask your stakeholders “what is the likelihood of the just in case scenario happening (again)?” and look at the “actual risk?” i.e. what does it cost the organisation?  
    As an example, I’ve had a stakeholder tell me that a record type had to be kept in order to prevent the organisation potentially incurring costs from a complaints process, However, it turned out that the actual total cost was just £24. What’s more, the likelihood of this risky event recurring was also very low. It had only happened once, and this was over six years ago. Ask how often, how likely, and how much it would cost to apply a risk management evaluation to your retention requirements.
  1. Get the full story on that “save the day” scenario: In the case where a record “saved the day” do not be afraid to probe (in a neutral way) to get some more information about the full scenario. It is quite possible you are not getting the full story. For example:
  • Did the record in question only help because it was a proxy for something else that should have been retained but was too difficult to find in a time-critical situation?
  • How long ago did this happen? Did it happen so long ago, things have moved on and it’s no longer relevant?
  • Was the person telling you this story involved enough to understand what actually happened? Could it even be an urban legend?

Helping people find more appropriate retention rules

These are just some of the ways you can begin to unpick the requirement to keep data “just in case.”

Getting to the bottom of the underlying concerns that drive such a requirement can help you to guide your stakeholders to more appropriate retention rules.

It can often feel like herding cats, but with patience and understanding, it’s a rewarding result once it’s done. All that’s left to do is implement your retention rules. We’ll be looking at implementation in the final of this blog of this series next time.

In the meantime, if you need some help talking to your stakeholders about records management, or would like to learn more about practical data retention and records management, simply contact us.

Book your place at the ARA Annual Conference 2023

Posted by on in Records Management, Retention Management

Meet us at the records management biggest reunion this year!

The Archive and Records Association (ARA) Annual Conference is returning to Belfast for the first time since 2007.

And we will be there!

The event runs from 30 August – 01 September 2023 and registration closes on 9 August at midnight – so get your ticket booked now!

Focused on users, stakeholders, colleagues, and collaborators, the ARA Annual Conference 2023 welcomes people from the global records management and archiving community who can attend a range of practical workshops, panel sessions and presentations as well as the opportunity to network with fellow members of the community during this three-day event.

It also welcomes high profile speakers and influential players of the recordkeeping sector, including our very own Records Management Expert, Noeleen Schenk!

Find Noeleen on Friday 01 Sept at 10.55am, where she will be presenting practical strategies to successfully design and apply retention and disposition rules for business records, as well as sharing a compelling case study and lessons learnt from a recent records management project for a major multinational company – it is not to be missed!

If you’re an archivist, records manager or conservator – this event is the place to be!

We look forward to meeting you at ARA 2023. Register now!